InterVarsity Press has done something that publishers love
to do: find a niche and fill it with a book series. Who hasn’t heard of the
“Dummies” series of books (IDG), for example? (I pitched one myself back when I
was writing computer books years ago and almost landed it). Well, InterVarsity
has found a nifty little niche with their “Pocket Dictionary” series. Check out
their list at www.ivpress.com/cgi-ivpress/book.pl/code=2700.
They kindly sent me three for this review.
Pocket Dictionary of Church History
This a handy little volume by Nathan Feldmeth. It’s one of
the few dictionaries one might actually just sit down and read straight
through. It’s also, of course, a quick reference for people, places, events,
movements, and ideas that have occurred through the ages. With more than 300
definitions, it includes: terms from ad fontes to via media;
leaders and theologians from Abelard to Zwingli; “isms” from Arminianism to
Unitarianism; places and events from the Azusa Street Mission to the White
Horse Inn; and councils from Nicaea to Vatican II. It also includes a nice
chronology of the Church History on the back pages.
Picking a few of my personal interests that I’ve researched
and written on, I found pretty good summaries of Athanasius, Calvin, Cranmer,
Huss, Luther, Machen, Savonarola, and Tyndale, but only fair ones of Finney
(soft on his horrendous weaknesses), Gottschalk (uses the unfortunate term
“double predestination”) and Wyclife (omits that his remains were dug up and
burned). Appallingly, Spurgeon is not even mentioned while Barth, Freud, Plato,
and Billy Graham are!
A few other oddities include that while “dispensationalism,”
“covenant theology,” “fundamentalism” and “liberalism” do appear, there is no
entry for other movements, such as: reformation (shocking!), ecumenism, evangelicalism, modernism, neo-orthodoxy,
charismatic movement, and others. This is only a 150-page book (4-1/4 x 7
inches), so another 25, or even 50, pages could have easily been added.
Bottom line, for only $8.00 retail, this is a handy volume.
Even with its weaknesses, it does a fairly good job as a quick reference or
basic overview of Church History.
(In a future post, I will review and recommend one of my
favorite Church History texts.)
Pocket Dictionary of the Reformed Tradition
Written by Kelly Kapic and Wesley Vander Lugt, this
excellent little reference provides quick access to more than 300 entries,
including: Latin terms such as ad fontes and the five solas;
theologians from Calvin to Torrance; confessions such as the Belgic and
Westminster; doctrines such as atonement and sanctification; and apologists
such as Francis Schaeffer and Cornelius Van Til. It, too, like the above, could
actually be read through at one’s leisure.
Other critical terms covered in this reference are:
Arminianism, Baptists (Reformed), Calvinism, common grace, grace, lapsarian
views, doctrines of grace, federal vision, Pelagianism, presuppositionalism,
Puritanism, Reformed Theology, TULIP, and of course all the key individuals.
I was also pleasantly surprised at the “dispensationalism”
entry; while containing the typical Reformed rhetoric of its introducing
“discontinuity into the biblical story,” it is honest enough to add that even
some Reformed theologians are dispensational. This pleased me since I am mildly
dispensational but also reformed (little “r”), not Reformed (capital “R”).
In many ways, this volume is a must-have companion to the
above book. What is not in one is often in the other. For example, while
“ecumenism,” “evangelicalism,” “neo-orthodoxy,” “reformation,” and “Spurgeon”
are not in the above, they are all here. In fact, IMHO, instead of separate
volumes at $8.00 each, these two should be a single volume for $12.00.
Nonetheless, I recommend it.
Pocket Dictionary for the Study of New Testament Greek
Penned by Matthew DeMoss, there is only one word for this
book: excellent. Now, to be clear, this is not a dictionary of
Greek vocabulary (as some users have misunderstood). Rather, it is
dictionary of the technical terms of the language. For example, you can quickly
lookup “case” or any one of the cases, “tense” or any one of them, and so
forth. If I may interject, there could have been a little more concerning the
“definite article.”
This is not only great for the beginner but also for those
whose seminary days are past and they just need a quick reminder. For example:
“I just can’t remember the contrast between the perfect and imperfect”; or,
“What is that pesky predicate nominative?”; or “What’s that Granville Sharp
Rule again?” or, “Don’t even get me started on all those genitives!”
I was also pleasantly surprised by the usually non-partisan
definition of terms related to textual criticism, such as: Byzantine text type,
codexes, conflation, critical text, eclectic text, majority text, and Textus
Receptus. For the most part, it is just the facts with no agenda, although
bias does show through in the pericope adulterae (Jn. 7:53–8:11) and the
Johannine Comma (1 Jn. 5:7-8).
Because of my passion for the critical importance of the
biblical languages for proper “exegesis” (yes, that’s in there, along with
“eisegesis”), I highly recommend this little reference.